Comments on: Wikipedia imploft? http://www.moqub.com/2006/06/27/wikipedia-imploft/ Vooral over bibliotheken, ICT in het onderwijs, social software en soms over kunst Tue, 24 Aug 2010 08:15:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Waarom blog ik eigenlijk? | Moqub's bibliotheek van dingen http://www.moqub.com/2006/06/27/wikipedia-imploft/comment-page-1/#comment-46193 Waarom blog ik eigenlijk? | Moqub's bibliotheek van dingen Sat, 13 Sep 2008 09:21:06 +0000 http://www.moqub.com/?p=336#comment-46193 [...] meeste spam komt binnen op de post Wikipedia imploft - een korte post met een comment waar ik nog steeds niet veel van [...] [...] meeste spam komt binnen op de post Wikipedia imploft – een korte post met een comment waar ik nog steeds niet veel van [...]

]]> By: piet http://www.moqub.com/2006/06/27/wikipedia-imploft/comment-page-1/#comment-417 piet Thu, 06 Jul 2006 09:31:36 +0000 http://www.moqub.com/?p=336#comment-417 Hallo, ten eerste is het me een grote troost om een lagelandtalige boek/info enthousiast te vinden die iets met cement heeft, lekker weinig wit op zijn pagina laat schitteren en nog een interessant genoeg om te beantwoorden soort postje serveert ook! Dank. Dan nu mijn eerste indruk: What an elitist moron. Too haughty and idiotic to realize he is applying the rules of phyzical contest with those of calm deliberate ripening of judgment (priority determination regarding application of adjustment powers last time i thought about it): "Postscript: The Wikipedians Fight Back This is the fifth essay I have written about the Wikipedia. A group of Wikipedians apparently decided to take revenge and/or to warn me off. They have authored a defamatory and slanderous article about "Sam Vaknin" in their "encyclopedia'. To leave no room for doubt, at the bottom of this new entry about me, they list all my articles against the Wikipedia. Additionally, I received an e-mail message from Brad Patrick, the Wikimedia's General Counsel (attorney), asking me to copy him on all future correspondence with Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, or anyone else associated with the Wikimedia Foundation and its projects. Couldn't be subtler. I declined his "request"." Oh damn, he sits with tripod too!!!! http://samvak.tripod.com/ Sees himself as an expert on narcissism but not a prof "I am NOT a mental health professional" .. . .no of course not, none of them are obsessively single track minded enough to be lumped with them lot, right, mr vankin? Hallo, ten eerste is het me een grote troost om een lagelandtalige boek/info enthousiast te vinden die iets met cement heeft, lekker weinig wit op zijn pagina laat schitteren en nog een interessant genoeg om te beantwoorden soort postje serveert ook!

Dank.

Dan nu mijn eerste indruk:

What an elitist moron. Too haughty and idiotic to realize he is applying the rules of phyzical contest with those of calm deliberate ripening of judgment (priority determination regarding application of adjustment powers last time i thought about it):

“Postscript: The Wikipedians Fight Back

This is the fifth essay I have written about the Wikipedia. A group of Wikipedians apparently decided to take revenge and/or to warn me off. They have authored a defamatory and slanderous article about “Sam Vaknin” in their “encyclopedia’. To leave no room for doubt, at the bottom of this new entry about me, they list all my articles against the Wikipedia.

Additionally, I received an e-mail message from Brad Patrick, the Wikimedia’s General Counsel (attorney), asking me to copy him on all future correspondence with Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, or anyone else associated with the Wikimedia Foundation and its projects. Couldn’t be subtler. I declined his “request”.”

Oh damn, he sits with tripod too!!!! http://samvak.tripod.com/ Sees himself as an expert on narcissism but not a prof “I am NOT a mental health professional” .. . .no of course not, none of them are obsessively single track minded enough to be lumped with them lot, right, mr vankin?

]]>